This post is also available in:
עברית (Hebrew)
Stories of invisible weapons tend to surface after fast, asymmetric operations. When defenders are overwhelmed quickly, especially by a smaller force, the search for an explanation often turns toward technology that feels unfamiliar or inexplicable. That dynamic has resurfaced following the operation that led to the capture of Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro, where online claims suggest U.S. forces used a mysterious “sonic weapon” to incapacitate security personnel.
The allegation is based largely on a video interview circulated on social media. In it, an unidentified guard describes an intense sensation—likened to sound or pressure—that reportedly caused bleeding, nausea, loss of balance, and an inability to resist. The account gained further attention after being reshared by a senior U.S. government spokesperson. Despite the attention, no independent evidence has emerged, and U.S. defense authorities have declined to comment beyond standard operational statements.
According to Interesting Engineering, the claims have revived debate around non-lethal and directed-energy technologies that have been studied for decades. The United States is known to have researched systems intended to disable adversaries without conventional gunfire. One example is the Active Denial System (ADS), which uses millimeter-wave energy to create intense surface discomfort. While publicly demonstrated and tested, it has never been confirmed in combat use. Another widely known tool is the Long Range Acoustic Device (LRAD), capable of projecting highly focused, painful sound for communication or crowd control, though its documented effects do not typically include the physical injuries described in the Venezuelan account.
Analysts note that the reported symptoms do not align cleanly with either system. As a result, attention has turned to older experimental concepts, such as radio-frequency technologies designed to disrupt balance and orientation. One such project, described in patents in the late 2000s, proposed using electromagnetic energy to interfere with the vestibular system. However, there is no public indication that this research ever progressed beyond laboratory stages.
More conventional explanations remain plausible. Exposure to blast overpressure from explosions, stun grenades, or a combination of shock and stress during a chaotic engagement can cause disorientation, vomiting, and bleeding. Memory distortion following concussive events is also well documented in combat psychology. In some cases, exaggeration or misinformation can serve tactical or psychological purposes, shifting blame or reinforcing narratives of technological dominance.
This highlights how perceptions of advanced technology can influence both public discourse and psychological operations. Directed-energy and non-lethal weapons research does exist, but the gap between experimental concepts and operational deployment is often wide. Until credible evidence emerges, the “sonic weapon” narrative remains unproven—another example of how modern conflicts generate myths alongside facts.
What the incident ultimately underscores is not the confirmed use of a secret weapon, but the enduring power of ambiguity in warfare. In an era of rapid information spread, even unverified claims can shape perceptions long after the shooting stops.
