This post is also available in:
עברית (Hebrew)
Air dominance is becoming harder to achieve as battlefields extend upward and outward, blurring the line between atmosphere and space. Traditional fighter jets are optimized for air combat, while space systems operate on entirely different timelines and constraints. As hypersonic weapons, space-based sensors, and long-range strike systems mature, militaries are grappling with how to control this expanded domain using platforms that were never designed for it.
Recent discussions in Chinese military circles suggest an ambitious answer: aircraft that merge air and space capabilities into a single operational concept. Analysts speaking on state television have pointed to a long-running research effort known as the Nantianmen Project as a blueprint for achieving future aerospace superiority. What was once framed largely as speculative or symbolic is now being discussed as a foundation for real-world development.
According to Interesting Engineering, the core idea behind the project is integration. Rather than treating airpower and spacepower as separate layers, the concepts envision fighter-sized platforms capable of operating across both regimes. These designs combine multiple advanced technologies—hypersonic flight, dual-mode propulsion for atmospheric and near-space operation, and next-generation stealth—into a single system intended to dominate future conflicts.
Several of the project’s concepts have already been displayed publicly. Among them is a vertical takeoff and landing fighter design that can be reconfigured for strike, evacuation, or rescue missions. Other proposals include a massive airborne and space-capable “mothership” designed to deploy and support smaller platforms, as well as concepts for space-based weapons. The Baidi, or “White Emperor,” presented as a lead combat aircraft within this ecosystem, has been a recurring centerpiece at major air shows.
Until recently, these models were widely viewed as technology demonstrators or science-fiction-inspired exhibits. That perception has begun to shift following statements by senior military academics, who now describe the project as reflecting concrete expectations for future warfare rather than pure imagination. According to these assessments, the remaining question is not whether such capabilities are achievable, but which enabling technologies will mature first and how quickly they can be integrated.
From a defense perspective, the implications are significant; platforms that can traverse air and near-space could threaten satellites, bypass conventional air defenses, and compress response times for adversaries. They also point to a future where control of space-adjacent altitudes becomes as decisive as traditional air superiority.
While timelines and technical feasibility remain unclear, the renewed emphasis on the project signals a broader trend: militaries are preparing for conflicts that extend beyond current operational boundaries. If even part of these concepts transitions from display halls to flight testing, it could reshape how air and space power are understood—and contested—in the decades ahead.
