This post is also available in:
עברית (Hebrew)
Small drones are no longer a niche threat. From improvised FPV strike platforms to loitering munitions and coordinated swarms, unmanned aircraft are exploiting gaps in traditional air defense systems. Low altitude flight paths, terrain masking, urban clutter, and spectrum congestion often allow drones to approach targets undetected until the last moment, forcing defenders into reactive interception under severe time pressure.
A new Israeli counter-UAS planning approach aims to address that problem before drones are even in the air. A next-generation upgrade to an existing battle resource optimization (BRO C-UAS by Omnisys) platform introduces a shift from reactive counter-drone defense to proactive, model-driven prevention. Instead of focusing only on detection and engagement during an attack, the system is designed to help operators anticipate how drones are most likely to approach and where defenses are weakest.
The core of the solution is a physics-accurate digital model of the operational environment. Terrain, buildings, vegetation, and infrastructure are analyzed to expose low-altitude approach corridors and blind spots that sensors may miss. On top of that model, an AI-based optimization engine calculates real detection, tracking, and engagement envelopes for available sensors and effectors, reflecting how systems actually perform under real terrain and spectrum conditions rather than ideal assumptions.
This allows planners to identify vulnerabilities in advance and deploy limited assets—such as radars, RF sensors, jammers, or interceptors—where they will have the greatest operational impact. The system can also evaluate multiple deployment options and operational concepts, recommending courses of action that improve coverage and interception probability while reducing mutual interference or redundant overlap between systems.
Rather than replacing existing command-and-control or sensor management tools, the platform functions as an independent planning and decision-support layer. It complements live systems by helping commanders prioritize sites, routes, and assets, and by generating recommendations that can be updated as conditions change. Because the AI continuously learns from the theater of operations and observed enemy behavior, optimization improves over time, including during active missions.
From a defense and homeland security perspective, this proactive approach reflects how the counter-drone problem is evolving. Drone proliferation is no longer confined to battlefields; critical infrastructure, borders, and civilian airspace are increasingly affected. Relying on intuition or static planning often leads to inefficient coverage and wasted resources.
By turning counter-UAS into a predictive, model-based discipline, the system addresses the realities of mass drone deployment and hybrid threats. As drone technology continues to spread and diversify, the ability to anticipate attacks and shape the defensive environment in advance may prove just as important as the interceptors themselves.
