This post is also available in:
עברית (Hebrew)
A new academic study has revealed that some widely used ad-blocking tools may be unintentionally exposing users to more harmful or misleading online content. The findings, based on a large-scale analysis by researchers at NYU Tandon School of Engineering, challenge assumptions about the safety and effectiveness of browser extensions marketed as privacy tools.
The focus of the study was Adblock Plus’s “Acceptable Ads” program, which permits a curated set of advertisements deemed less disruptive. Researchers examined more than 1,200 ads displayed to users in the U.S. and Germany. The results showed that users of the Acceptable Ads feature saw 13.6% more problematic ads compared to users who had no ad-blocker installed at all, according to TechXplore.
Using an automated system powered by AI, the team evaluated ads across seven categories of concern: content inappropriate for minors, explicit or offensive material, misleading health or financial claims, manipulative design patterns, fraudulent ads, political messages without proper disclosure, and overly intrusive formats. The AI model aligned with human reviewers in 79% of cases, providing a scalable way to monitor ad quality across environments.
One key concern raised by the research is how some advertising platforms behave differently when they detect that a user has a privacy-focused extension enabled. While new ad exchanges added to the Acceptable Ads program generally served cleaner content, older, already approved exchanges delivered proportionally more problematic ads to users with ad blockers — raising the possibility that these users are being specifically targeted.
The issue is particularly worrying in the context of child safety. Roughly 10% of ads shown to underage users during the study violated content rules designed to protect minors, despite the presence of privacy tools meant to prevent such exposure.
These findings also point to a deeper issue: ad-blocker users may be unintentionally making themselves easier to identify. Researchers warn this could enable new forms of digital fingerprinting, where the very act of using privacy tools becomes a signal used by advertisers to track users more effectively.
The study calls into question the reliability of ad-blocking software as a blanket solution for online privacy and highlights the need for better oversight and transparency in how online ads are served — especially to privacy-conscious users.
